Roberto Balbino
EN24 min read

The Country That Almost Exists: Could Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica Become One State?

Economically logical. Politically almost impossible.

There is a country in Central America that does not exist.

It would have approximately 48 million inhabitants, an economy of roughly $325 billion, access to both the Pacific and the Caribbean, proximity to the world’s largest consumer market, substantial agricultural resources, renewable energy, manufacturing capacity, tourism, sophisticated services and one of the most strategically useful locations in the Western Hemisphere.

Its territory would stretch continuously from Mexico toward Panama.

Its citizens would overwhelmingly speak the same language.

Its countries share colonial history, legal traditions, religion, migration patterns, trade relationships and, to a remarkable extent, the same economic destiny.

And there is an even stranger fact.

This hypothetical country has existed before.

Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica formed the Central American Federation after independence from Spain. The United States formally recognised the federation in 1824. It began disintegrating in 1838 and had effectively disappeared by the early 1840s.

Two centuries later, the basic economic logic that encouraged federation has not disappeared.

It may actually have become stronger.

What has changed is politics.

And that produces a fascinating geopolitical question:

Would recreating a united Central America make economic sense today?

The answer is surprisingly close to yes.

But a second question immediately follows:

Could these five countries actually share sovereignty?

Today, almost certainly not.

And understanding why tells us much more about Central America than another discussion about poverty, migration or crime ever could.

First: The Map Finally Makes Sense

Honduras is essential to the argument.

Without Honduras, a federation of Guatemala, El Salvador, Nicaragua and Costa Rica would be geographically absurd.

More articles

All articles →

Subscribe