Roberto Balbino
EN12 min read

ARTIFICIAL: THE POWER BEHIND SAM ALTMAN

Guadagnino’s OpenAI film and the limits of corporate accountability.

ARTIFICIAL: THE POWER BEHIND SAM ALTMAN

Luca Guadagnino’s OpenAI film invites scrutiny of a powerful founder. The more consequential story concerns the institutions, investors and dependencies that make such power possible.

Luca Guadagnino’s Artificial arrives with a subject already surrounded by competing narratives: scientific breakthrough, commercial ambition, extraordinary promises and an unresolved argument about who should govern technologies with consequences far beyond the companies developing them.

The film has entered festival circulation at the New York Film Festival. NEON lists its release in selected American cinemas for 25 December 2026. This article is based on official film materials, published criticism and the documented history behind its subject. It is an analysis of the film’s premise and the debate surrounding it, rather than a firsthand screening review.

That distinction leaves plenty to examine.

A film about Sam Altman can ask what kind of person builds an organisation like OpenAI. A financial and institutional analysis must also ask what kind of system makes that person difficult to challenge.

The second question is ultimately more important. Personalities change. Dependencies survive them.

1. The founder as the centre of the story

According to the New York Film Festival’s official description, Artificial extends across roughly two decades of AI development. Directed by Guadagnino and written by Simon Rich, the 140-minute film features Andrew Garfield as Altman, Yura Borisov as Ilya Sutskever and Mark Rylance as Geoffrey Hinton. Its narrative begins with Sutskever’s scientific formation and follows the intersection of research and entrepreneurial ambition.

That scope provides an opportunity to examine how discoveries become companies, how companies become strategically important, and how their leaders acquire influence over decisions affecting people who never agreed to be part of the experiment.

More articles

All articles →

Subscribe